Renegade uses Indians or Gatling to kill everyone
Moderátoři: lucabil, Suzy Lafayette
Renegade uses Indians or Gatling to kill everyone
Suppose everyone alive only has one life point left, then the Renegade uses Indians or Gatling that actually kills everyone including the Sheriff, does the Renegade win, or do the Outlaws win?
I think the Renegade should win if he is able to do this.
I think the Renegade should win if he is able to do this.
I don't really understood what you were saying . I believe what mec25 was trying to say that if the Renegade kills EVERYONE, including the outlaws/sheriff with the indians/gatling --> the result? I myself would call it a tie; both the sheriff and the outlaws/deputies die simutaneously, not in any specific order.srab píše:If Sheriff die last but one , and Renegade is last man standing , than Renegade win. But if are Outlaw and Renegade alive after Sheriiffs death, wins Outlaw.
- lucabil
- Deputy Marshall Sheriff
- Příspěvky: 152
- Registrován: 28 bře 2006, 10:02
- Bydliště: Pisa, Italy
YomY,
even if the game rules never say that explicitly, the game never sees the state of the game DURING the resolution of the effect of a card.
This means that, for the purpose of calculating the winner, the gatling - Indians effect is seen as atomic. There's no moment when one is dead and not the other.
Moreover, this is perfectly acceptable from a flavour point of view: unless you are in Matrix, it makes no sense to win a game because of a tenth of second during gatling shot.
even if the game rules never say that explicitly, the game never sees the state of the game DURING the resolution of the effect of a card.
This means that, for the purpose of calculating the winner, the gatling - Indians effect is seen as atomic. There's no moment when one is dead and not the other.
Moreover, this is perfectly acceptable from a flavour point of view: unless you are in Matrix, it makes no sense to win a game because of a tenth of second during gatling shot.